CGE-ABM Framework

Version: 2.0 Status: Conceptual Framework — Under Development Validation Target: Q4 2026 - Q1 2027

Download Full Report (PDF)


Introduction

Problem

Policy analysis faces a persistent structural gap. Macro models provide economy-wide consistency but flatten populations into “representative agents”—averaging away the distributional effects that matter most for equity. Micro models capture heterogeneity but lack the aggregate constraints that keep results economically coherent.

The tools available today force a choice: rigor at the macro level, or realism at the micro level. For research programs concerned with how policies actually affect different communities, this is an unacceptable trade-off.

Objective

This framework bridges macro and micro scales through bi-directional coupling between a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model and an Agent-Based Model (ABM). The goal is structured scenario exploration: examining how policies interact with social dynamics to produce equity outcomes, without collapsing into false precision or losing aggregate consistency.


Methods

System Architecture

The framework specifies a modular architecture with five primary components:

Component Description Status
Economic (CGE) General equilibrium solver with SAM calibration, nested production functions, and market-clearing conditions Core: Complete
Social (ABM) 10,000+ heterogeneous agents with demographic attributes, cultural profiles, and social network positions 70% Complete
Equity Assessment Gini coefficient, Theil index, and Atkinson index with decomposition capabilities Validated
Media Influence Broadcast signal model for information campaigns affecting cultural traits 60% Complete
Integration Bi-directional coupling orchestrating CGE-ABM feedback loops One-way: Complete

Data Sources

  • Economic Data: BEA Input-Output tables, IMPLAN databases, state-level SAMs
  • Social Data: ACS PUMS, CPS, Consumer Expenditure Survey, PSID
  • Cultural Proxies: World Values Survey, General Social Survey
  • Network Structures: Calibrated canonical models (small-world, scale-free, spatial lattice)

Key Assumptions

  1. Competitive markets with flexible prices (no quantity rationing)
  2. Annual time-stepping with within-period equilibrium
  3. Stylized social network topologies
  4. Simplified media effects (broadcast without algorithmic targeting)
  5. Exogenous technology and productivity

Results

Scenario Templates

The framework demonstrates four scenario templates illustrating analytical capabilities:

1. Progressive Tax Reform

  • Policy: +10% marginal rate on top quintile, +$2,000 transfers to bottom quintiles
  • Media: Tax fairness campaign (60% reach)
  • Expected: ~14% Gini reduction, ~-0.8% GDP impact

2. Environmental Policy

  • Policy: $50/ton carbon tax with lump-sum rebate
  • Media: Climate awareness campaign (70% reach)
  • Expected: 20-30% emissions reduction, sectoral reallocation

3. Education Equity Investment

  • Policy: +2% GDP education spending to bottom quintiles
  • Media: Education opportunity campaign
  • Expected: ~10% Gini reduction over 50-year horizon

4. Social Cohesion Shock

  • Scenario: Polarizing media event causing trust distribution bifurcation
  • Expected: Network segregation, ~-1.5% GDP, persistent polarization

These are conceptual templates—NOT empirical results or predictions.


Discussion

Validation Status

Phase Status
Component-level testing Complete
One-way integration Validated
Two-way coupling stability 60% Complete
Empirical calibration Not Started
Historical backcasting Not Started
Peer review Not Started

Limitations

  • CGE equilibrium assumptions may overstate market efficiency
  • Cultural parameters have weak empirical grounding
  • Media model excludes algorithmic targeting and echo chambers
  • Within-group heterogeneity underrepresented
  • Time horizon limited to 5-20 years

Appropriate Use Cases

  • Academic research and methodological development
  • Scenario exploration and comparative policy analysis
  • Stakeholder deliberation and policy discussion
  • Educational demonstrations of multi-scale modeling

Not Approved For

  • Regulatory compliance determinations
  • Automated decision-making or policy optimization
  • Predictive forecasting of specific outcomes
  • Sole basis for irreversible resource allocation

Access

The framework is positioned as a decision-support tool for deliberation, not a predictive engine. Reference implementation available under Apache 2.0 license.

Download Full Whitepaper (PDF)


Framework developed by Khipu Research Labs. For inquiries: info@krlabs.dev

Website

krlabs.dev

Address

16192 Coastal Highway
Lewes, DE 19958
USA